the gunslinger 3,366 Posted October 24, 2013 Share Posted October 24, 2013 Would you not be satisfied GS if such revelation was limited to a confirmation that the persons behind these investment companies was not CW. Would that not suffice ? from someone trustworthy. sure. not just cw but no one dodgey at all. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted October 24, 2013 Share Posted October 24, 2013 if it's someone dodgey toxic will be trying to spin it before the night is out. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
D'Artagnan 173 Posted October 24, 2013 Share Posted October 24, 2013 if it's someone dodgey toxic will be trying to spin it before the night is out. In that case its obviously not - otherwise he would have already been swamping messageboards and the press with titbits about his the individuals work with disadvantaged children in Africa etc etc 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
aweebluesoandso 290 Posted October 24, 2013 Share Posted October 24, 2013 Scooby Doo would have cracked this easy, bet you it's Peter Liewell when the unmasked the villian. Scoobydooloyal. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darthter 542 Posted October 24, 2013 Share Posted October 24, 2013 As a customer I have an absolute right to ask who my money is benefiting. at the moment it certainly isn't the shareholders!!! I don't believe any dividends were paid for the years....the only folk benefiting are those who are or have been involved on a daily basis. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom Davison 0 Posted October 24, 2013 Share Posted October 24, 2013 I confess to being a bit lost by all of this. What difference does it really make to know the identities of the mysterious investors? If their identities are revealed and we don't approve, what can we do about it, anyway? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JTP 0 Posted October 24, 2013 Share Posted October 24, 2013 I confess to being a bit lost by all of this. What difference does it really make to know the identities of the mysterious investors? If their identities are revealed and we don't approve, what can we do about it, anyway? Take their majority power away by backing someone else in the vote. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted October 24, 2013 Share Posted October 24, 2013 I confess to being a bit lost by all of this. What difference does it really make to know the identities of the mysterious investors? If their identities are revealed and we don't approve, what can we do about it, anyway? withdraw our financial support from them. or any number of things up to that point. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
j1mgg 0 Posted October 24, 2013 Share Posted October 24, 2013 On a side note, does anyone know how much Purslow was on at Liverpool? We will have to see what happens tomorrow, but if the names are released, I am sure there will be a task force already on the marks to get digging dirt on them, if they haven't already started. Maybe what tonights meeting is all about. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Night Owl Posted October 24, 2013 Share Posted October 24, 2013 Looks like things are coming to a boil and not before time. Hopefully this can be resolved on the double because I don't think I can take another full calendar year of this carry on. Hail the return of tactics, red cards and goals, this boardroom drama has had well over its allotted 15 minutes of fame. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.