Jump to content

 

 

maineflyer

  • Posts

    4,764
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by maineflyer

  1. Why did you feel compelled to mention them then?
  2. WTF is this, twenty questions? I'd ban the bastard - and the newspaper he worked for - end of. That's what I advocate. Souness did it and it worked a treat. What would he do - fukk all he could do. What other effects would it have - it would make every journo and every editor in Scotland think twice before bad-mouthing Rangers. How did I do, will you be awarding marks out of ten?
  3. What is it about Rangers supporters who, even after years of this shite from Spiers, still advocate doing nothing as a first option. Then, if really riled, might just suggest dropping hints. It's little wonder we are where we are today, with this fixation on style over substance. Nancy boys.
  4. Couldn't give a monkey's about celtc tbh and I don't understand this inability to mention Rangers without also referring to the filth from the east end. As for breakaways, the present path isn't exactly doing us many favours and since the country of our roots is now almost unrecognisable I see little reason to remain part of it. In fact, if we're honest, it's more a case of Rangers being cast out than us leaving.
  5. Fark orf.:box: Randomsmilieloyal
  6. Pedantic git of the year award!:spl:
  7. You notice bloody Bain couldn't bring himself to talk about Rangers without coming away with the continual "Rangers and Celtic" bollocks to make sure everyone understands we don't actually exist in our own right.
  8. :violin:yeah yeah but that's what smilies are for:whistle: and I thought he did come back well after it. Smilieloyal
  9. The one thing you can be sure of is that Bain will be making this statement at someone else's request? There's no way the gopher is articulating original thought.
  10. I'd love to think differently but I don't think you'll never hear it.
  11. Great sportsman, great character, great Brit. One of the very best, Geoffrey.
  12. To be fair to everyone Craig, I don't think anyone actually used any insults. You'd need severely thin skin to be offended by anything said above, which I don't think describes the good folks of Gersnet. Simple banter. Or are you just having a trigger happy day in the sun?
  13. That's always possible.... I'm so mixed up, I could just be expressing divergent views .... depends on your perspective really.
  14. Elementary multi-perspectivism, moi?
  15. True ..... but the corollary is that not everything has to be confusion and indecision either. It is possible for some things to be straighforward and obvious, without compromise or contradiction.
  16. It looks like you're having a great deal of difficulty making your mind up. It makes us weak but it makes us strong. Better get used to it but there are opportunities and we have to take them. Which is it - surely indecision isn't the way forward? I read your post but haven't a clue what your point is.
  17. You may very well win the Cynic of the Month award but I'd just like you to know that I welcome the competition and bear you no grudge. :spl: PS - (whisper it) I agree completely.
  18. Sorry Tannochsidebear but, with the greatest respect, that just doesn't stand up. It's like saying Heinz can't make soup as well as beans. The world is full of diversified organisations, each conducting all sorts of activities successfully, but adhering to a common vision and set of core objectives. In fact it's exactly why they are so successful, how they manage to cover lot's of ground without duplication of purpose and continual changes of strategy and direction. The fears you express are unfounded. A single organisation could only deliver gains rather than losses. Surely the current situation must persuade you of that. In fact, I'm staggered you could see it any other way.
  19. Well said Sir, it couldn't be better expressed.
  20. I think you can take it he was simply desperate to confirm his credentials and ensure further work from the BBC. Nevin is a Grade A arsehole who is making a very comfortable living by conforming to the required media stereotype. I like nothing better than to see him smeared across the screen on of these days.
  21. As soon as you have mor ethan one representative organisation, you also have the potential for divergence of aims and method, as well as for the rivalry that inevitably comes with individual aspiration. That's why none of our current organisations have made any tangible difference .... or ever will. Each may have some merit if you look closely enough at the detail but the fact remains that they have all been around for a considerable time and none has even been able to decide whether they are acting for the fans or for the directors of the club. The issue of RSA v RST is that the RST is already a self-funding, voluntary-membership organisation. The RSA is not. Since neither are currently effective, I can see no reason to re-invent the RSA when a properly run RST could provide everything that's required. The enduring condemnation of all Rangers supporters organisations is that they continue to co-exist together rather than coalesce. We all know they are actually in competition and until that stops, we ain't going anywhere.... and it won't stop until we have leadership that puts the mission before their own personal interests.... which we don't.
  22. I thought the singing was particularly tuneful and I took no offence whatsoever. Wonder what the difference could be between me and that rancid piece of weasel shit Graham Spiers? Or his wee buddy Pat Nevin, the thinking man's pish stain, who I thought would have a seizure last night on Radio Scotland trying to persuade everyone he had single handedly ended racism in England and we only needed to listen to him to sort out the problem with Rangers. The problem with Rangers? Hello Hello we are the billy boys....
  23. One of my favourite players but it certainly wasn't Nacho's best game tbh.
  24. I'd rather he was here to change the RST... didn't he say that somewhere? If he's only here to promote what we already have then it's going to be a long and unsuccessful task. I'm interested to see what actually happens because I seem to remember hearing it all before.
  25. I'd privatise the BBC tomorrow. At least then I wouldn't have to contribute financially to their blatant anti-Rangers agenda. As for the Daily Mail, no one forces me to buy it or read it ....... so I don't.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.