Jump to content

 

 

RANGERRAB

 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    13,614

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    19

Everything posted by RANGERRAB

  1. RANGERRAB
    It is how he managed to acquire Rangers in the first place which is the key to all of this. We all know SDM wasn't 'duped' don't we ?
  2. RANGERRAB
    They run the SPFL. They run the SFA. They can do what they like. This is Scottish football 2014. Unless we are prepared to build bridges with the rest of Scottish football and overthrow them it'll continue like this.
  3. RANGERRAB
    With the benefit of hindsight the financial carnage Whyte caused should have been expected once all was known about him like AJ did at the time of the takeover. I suspect he(Phil multinames)had been advised by others regards this. The others being those who orchestrated the oldco's financial collapse
  4. RANGERRAB
    I don't doubt for a minute that his allegations are untrue. There's no reason for us to run out of money when you consider the worth of the individuals and organisations who now own Rangers.And there's DK too. However when the CEO asks players to consider a 15 percent wage cut then you invite this sort of thing.I cannot deny I have genuine concerns about our CEO and his 120 day business review. How is it progressing I wonder ? As far as I can see that in addition to the proposed players wage cut all we've heard about are ST price increases & Ally's long awaited salary cut.Doesnt exactly take a genius to come up with these proposals does it?
  5. RANGERRAB
    They've always got to bring the Irish Catholic bit into everything don't they? Nothing to do with the fact he's a vile,despicable person who commands very little respect outwith his own vile club is it?
  6. RANGERRAB
    You need to remember that many clubs are giving out free ST's and free matchday tickets so the attendance figures are fictitious anyway in my opinion. I know of St Mirren & Motherwell supporters buying one adult season ticket and getting THREE free U16 ST's !!!!!!!!
  7. RANGERRAB
    Again Keevins is peddling the line about us being punished. Punished for what ? We entered administation/Liquidation because we were bought by a fraudster who withheld PAYE/NI because he hadn't the funds to run the club. No other reason.Nothing to do with debts like the laughable £134m once quoted. Keevins would be better off investigating how Whyte managed to acquire Rangers in the first place but that might unearth too many unsavoury characters in banks well known for their affiliations to the east end of glasgow
  8. RANGERRAB
    How many supporters organisations do we have? There are far too many
  9. RANGERRAB
    I reckon quite a few of their main players could be gone by next season anyway.Who wants to play in this league every week? Just ask Ledley
  10. RANGERRAB
    As far as I know Dave king doesn't believe in fan ownership so I'd say he'd unlikely to want to become involved were fan ownership of Rangers ever to happen.
  11. RANGERRAB
    If he doesn't think we'll get promoted next season then he should be removed from his position immediately. Such a stupid thing to say. Genuinely hope he was mis-quoted
  12. RANGERRAB
    Nothing wrong with what he said. Now let's see him get some investment into the club along with Somers and Crichton too.Have to say I'm more than a little disappointed that as the transfer window closes we'll not be signing anyone.
  13. RANGERRAB
    Perhaps a real hammering from 'them' in the SC will waken some of us up and realise this '120 day business review' is a load of b@llshit. Dave King is right. We need investment in the first team squad now otherwise crowds will fall away like happened in the early 1980's
  14. RANGERRAB
    Don't see this appointment lasting too long somehow
  15. RANGERRAB
    Handing out personal tax details isn't breaking the law ? At the very least a confidentiality agreement will have been broken I'd have thought. Regards Whyte I'm sure when he lost his Ticketus appeal before Christmas it was 'fraudulent misrepresentation' as I recall. Up here the case concerns how he got Rangers in the first place I'd have thought I.e. Was SDM was into selling and why
  16. RANGERRAB
    They haven't really you know. Liewell has such an iron grip on the media in this cesspit of a country that the media simply will not report anything negative about Celt@c .Anyone who dares to do this will find themselves banned from the Co-op dome as Keevins found out. One of the factors which will determine how successful our new CEO is will be his dealings with the mhedia in this country.He must fight fire with fire and go after those who seek to spread lies and rumours about us whilst ignoring damaging stories about them.
  17. RANGERRAB
    oK do the maths for 'Well. If they'd got a couple of Gers televised visits last season they'd probably have got somewhere between £150k to £200k per game. And they wouldn't have lost £180k then would they? don't forget too that this was the club that allegedly finished last season on its supporters trust overdraft (overdraft note not account) Ah well (no pun intended) that's what they get when their Celtic supporter chief exec. Ms Dempster sides with Liewell by removing us from the then SPL. Liewell's strategy is quite simple by keeping all premiership clubs in poverty to allow Celt@c easy access to the CL without us.Lack of SPFL sponsorship and a paltry TV deal ensures that.
  18. RANGERRAB
    Which sane, sensible CEO would want their company's name associated with the toxic brand that is the SPFL ? How to destroy a company's name and reputation in one fell swoop !!!!!
  19. RANGERRAB
    How do you think Whyte got Rangers? Don't you know the story.
  20. RANGERRAB
    Misspent for over a decade had nothing to do with Administration/Liquidation. It was due to Whyte not paying PAYE/NI. Nothing else
  21. RANGERRAB
    Well how else did he get the club? He'd no money of his own
  22. RANGERRAB
    Administration/Liquidation only happened because a fraudster got the club due to the valiant efforts by the bhoys at LBG
  23. RANGERRAB
    Increasing ST prices needs a vast improvement from the dross on the park we watched yesterday.
  24. RANGERRAB
    As they formed two new companies in the process.......you wont hear much said about that will you that they're effectively three companies
  25. RANGERRAB
    If there is to be a second share issue won't current shareholders need to get first refusal?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.