stewarty
-
Posts
8,403 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
22
Everything posted by stewarty
-
The KDS massive are en-route.....
-
Post some pics so we can all enjoy! :spl:
-
United deserved it, no question. In some way I'm actually quite relieved we went out. Can you imagine the shrieking and wailing from the Mhanks if we got a victory tonight? 3 penalty shouts and a legit goal not given..... It would be twisted as being confirmation that the refs are biased.
-
Vinnie Bhoy 27 minutes ago Post #22 First-team starter Group: Members McStay or Hay in to the end of the season- absolutely no organisation! McGeady at left back??? Eh? The fact he was crying at the end shows hes doomed. Awwwww, poor wee plastic tattie chaser was greetin!!!!!
-
I'd go with that too Zappa. We've been saying this for months but its time for Lafferty to step up
-
If we pull off the treble now, it will be Very Super Rangers!
-
Bloody hell. Gonna be a tight one chaps...
-
Sorry, I should clarify... Of course we are allowed to appeal, but its not really in the spirit of the game which is why it shouldn't be allowed. The timing of the appeal speaks volumes
-
Indeed. And that kind of tactic shouldnt be allowed, be it us or anyone else. If the SFA had asked the ref to review his decision in anticipation of an appeal then I don't have a problem with that. Of course we expect that this would be the case for other clubs in the future so one to bookmark for future reference!
-
Waste of �£1k. Pointless appeal
-
Hope he moves down south and disappears into obscurity. Right where he belongs!
-
Good shout. I'm off to find the match thread...
-
I think most of the bullshit has come from the speculation in the media and the online community. I will await something more official before passing judgement. And I'm not sure the minutes and other references dug out from the GCC website tells us one way or the other.
-
Clearly discussions have been held and agreements have been made on some level. In fact, the minutes you referenced above had the following paragraph... Clearly there is more to it than we know currently. So, it would also appear that, given we haven't heard anything since then, we have not yet gone back with more detailed proposals. But what I take from all this is that there appears to be a genuine desire from GCC to assist Rangers in developing its proposals. Whether there has been detailed approved planning consent or not, I have to agree that the premise that this whole ' there is no planning consent' argument is just spin and semantics. PS - Wabash - good digging!- I began to search for some documents but quickly gave up due to the shite nature of the GCC website search function.
-
Anyone fancy a trip GCC's offices? It would seem to me that their website is both contradictory and not entirely up to date. If nothing else, if Rangers made claims that permission was granted, outline or otherwise. Had it not been, I'm sure some official from GCC would be putting us all straight.
-
Wabash - if you use the GCC website as your source to confirm whether or not planning consent (outline or otherwise) was indeed given, why would you then discount that same source when it shows a page confirming that outline planning permission was indeed given?
-
On BBC Scotland, chief.
-
Its like silly season in the lead up to and during a transfer window. Yawn...
-
I think he is referring to this... http://www.heraldscotland.com/sport/spl/rangers/comment-the-for-sale-sign-will-still-be-up-at-ibrox-next-week-1.1014429
-
Great debate guys I fall into the Calscot/ Super_Ally camp here, for the most part, but I get both sides of the argument. What I think it comes down to is money. We don't have any to invest in our team at the moment, and our ability to compete in the Champions League, even in a modest sense, dissappears. We are also hampered by societal problems with alcohol, drugs and lack of exercise the X-Box generation are famous for which means there is less home grown talent available compared to yesteryear. The net result is a manager who has to play the cards he is dealt. And right now he's playing Texas Hold-em and his hole cards are 7/2 off-suit.
-
Only vague in the sense he can't say anything tangible due to stock market rules. Everything else more or less confirms what we already know or strongly suspected.
-
The trouble with 'blue sky thinkers' is that they get all wrapped up in jargon and process and forget what the hell they are meant to be doing. I've never met one I didn't think sounded like a fanny! Back to the main thrust of your post- I agree totally. But how can this be achieved and why haven't the gurus employed previously been able to do this? For me the answer lies in strategy. I dont ever remember hearing of a club strategy at any level, be it on or off the pitch. That's not to say that valid strategies don't exist, but rather, we may be falling down on their execution. Either that or they're just crap. :devil:
-
I didn't think the Boyd/ Lafferty substitution was the reason we got pegged back - it was mostly defensive errors that cost us. We missed Bougie and Whittaker had a stinker. Plus you have to bear in mind it was a cup game and we're still on for the treble. It could have been a lot worse!
-
NB: I'm playing devil's advocate here... It may be slim, but it is possible. It would mean forking out a huge transfer fee and busting their wage structure but I can see them trying to appease the fans in some way. This could be it...
-
He's decent but I'd far rather Wilson play than him.
