ChelseaBoy

As an aside. Much more history with Chelsea than Millwall https://www.ablueheart.com/football/chelsea/history-and-friendship-between-chelsea-and-glasgow-rangers

I doubt the guy was there then

I wouldn't trade Morelos for either Roofe or Itten or both together. We need all three plus Defoe as extra back up.

I thought the same about Chris Sutton.... and was right.

Ollocks

Yes defence definitely needs some surgery.

Like it, clean lines with no silly patterns. A winner for me.

Solid start, well done boys.

Hope your right, can't stand teams in red or green winning anything!!!

Keep up Compo, Ted Drake changed the nickname in 1953

?????

I bet the PL would shite themselves if they had to make a decision.

Unfortunately yes, but saying that at least he isn't on the prowl for another club!!

Ake is average and City will find that out. Chelsea fans only rue De Bruyne and Salah as they were bought cheap 7m and 11m respectively then sold by Mourinho and was terrible business by a manager that does not develop players. Van Aanholt is rubbish. Tomori is a better centre half than either Ake or Van Aanholt and other home grown players such as James, Mount, Gilmour, Abraham, Hudson Odoi, Christiansen and Loftus Cheek have all many games under their belts and secured 4th place with their ages between 18 - 24, plus another 6 or 7 pushing the first team - the future looks quite bright.

That was the same on some of the early video games, they always had a team called Glasgow and left it at that. I suppose fans decided for themselves what that meant!!

I'd give that crystal ball a clean

West Ham might have him

Minimum wage for all and no Jimmy Hill to save them

That's a given when stated aims are to defund the Police (we have first hand evidence of a lawless society in Seattle) smash Capitalism (so i suppose pensions, savings, housing and entrepreneurship are all fair game) close all prisons (speaks for itself) and for all white people to educate themselves.. whatever that means. So would a club say they are in support of BLM with the following exceptions......?

It's not just happening here, it's being debated by all clubs supporters large enough to have a forum. Nobody at any club anywhere has suggested otherwise, just like any other sport. I don't know why some people feel you have to make public shows of identity politics. If people want to come and participate they will, its so lazy to blame all the ills on white protestants or whites in general. Lazy and racist.

So can you eliminate racism by defunding the police and closing all prisons? Just two more of BLM's manifesto of madness.

Fat chance of that happening. Every club are and will be expected to make a full and public (just look at the PL) show of support for BLM regardless of the actual philosophy behind that particular cult.

Like it. Modern, Fresh and cannot be mistaken. A long way from the early Rangers crest and a very similar design from Chelsea in 1953!!!

Sorry what club were you both thinking of?

Can but hope