the gunslinger 3,366 Posted May 13, 2014 Share Posted May 13, 2014 I'm afraid you really mean the above ... Pretending new faces mean new people running us does nothing for the argument 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thinker 887 Posted May 13, 2014 Share Posted May 13, 2014 Has he publically denied the rumors that he did receive about $18M of the $20M he invested previously in Rangers back via a shady side deal or company? I've heard this claim numerous times both on and offline. I think if it was true it would have been in the papers but I've not been able to provide evidence to prove it false (neither have those making the claim have had evidence to back it up). Has anyone traced the actual source of the rumour? And could anyone provide some links (that I can circulate) to shoot it down once and for all? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted May 13, 2014 Share Posted May 13, 2014 I've heard this claim numerous times both on and offline. I think if it was true it would have been in the papers but I've not been able to provide evidence to prove it false (neither have those making the claim have had evidence to back it up). Has anyone traced the actual source of the rumour? And could anyone provide some links (that I can circulate) to shoot it down once and for all? It's utterly false. It was made up by Phil 5 names and Yahoos spread it. They claimed it was in court papers but the court papers actually show the opposite they show him pumping 18 million in. The rangers and Murray sports accounts show that the money was never repaid. Only Yahoos still believe it. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,338 Posted May 13, 2014 Share Posted May 13, 2014 It's utterly false. It was made up by Phil 5 names and Yahoos spread it. They claimed it was in court papers but the court papers actually show the opposite they show him pumping 18 million in. The rangers and Murray sports accounts show that the money was never repaid. Only Yahoos still believe it. Well let DK publicly deny that he got this money back. He has done this? If so when ? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 5,366 Posted May 13, 2014 Share Posted May 13, 2014 Well let DK publicly deny that he got this money back. He has done this? If so when ? Why should he deny every crazy rumour that's out there? It's clear from the accounts that he didn't get the cash back, and it was just people misunderstanding what happened when the RFC shares were disentangled from MSL. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
buster. 4,840 Posted May 13, 2014 Share Posted May 13, 2014 I've heard this claim numerous times both on and offline. I think if it was true it would have been in the papers but I've not been able to provide evidence to prove it false (neither have those making the claim have had evidence to back it up). Has anyone traced the actual source of the rumour? And could anyone provide some links (that I can circulate) to shoot it down once and for all? It's a little ironic that some seem to worry more about unsubstantiated claims of someone taking back part of what he put in rather than huge sums money of club income/IPO cash actually going out of the door without apparent and proportionate return. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted May 13, 2014 Share Posted May 13, 2014 Well let DK publicly deny that he got this money back. He has done this? If so when ? Yes weeks ago. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted May 13, 2014 Share Posted May 13, 2014 http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/dave-king-insist-hell-not-3279689 Confirms he lost it here. So no more yahoo lies please. Unless your a yahoo. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thinker 887 Posted May 13, 2014 Share Posted May 13, 2014 It's a little ironic that some seem to worry more about unsubstantiated claims of someone taking back part of what he put in rather than huge sums money of club income/IPO cash actually going out of the door without apparent and proportionate return. It is. But I like to be able to answer an accusation with proof that it's wrong rather than with a "Naw he didnae!" or, even worse, an "Aye but they did worse" type of response. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,318 Posted May 13, 2014 Share Posted May 13, 2014 Pretending new faces mean new people running us does nothing for the argument Assuming that new faces mean old people running the club is IMHO equally removed from fact as the other assumption. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.