Jump to content

 

 

BrahimHemdani

 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    11,099

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by BrahimHemdani

  1. BrahimHemdani
    The Chairman told Lambert to get a grip; too much wages to sit in the stand. We can have him for free next season if we can negotiate a sensible wage deal.
  2. BrahimHemdani
    How many of them would you want playing for us in the SPL?
  3. BrahimHemdani
    Perhaps the Sandy Jardine player liaison role?
  4. BrahimHemdani
    Green could sell sand to the Arabs and you know it.
  5. BrahimHemdani
    Recruitment Pack The Committee will review all Fans Board applications from 20 August and nominate a shortlist of supporters for election to the Fans Board. The shortlist will be selected based on evaluation of all application forms against the criteria listed within this recruitment pack - job description and personal profile. A shortlist of nominees in each of the 12 categories will be identified by the Nominations committee. The application forms for each of the successful shortlisted nominees will be posted publicly on rangers.co.uk for supporter consideration. Members, including all season ticket holders, will then be given the opportunity to vote on the shortlist of nominees in each of the 12 categories. Voting will be online in September. The votes will be counted and verified and the 12 member Fans Board announced thereafter. Constitution 10.3 Once the Candidates have been announced, the Club will fix a specific period of time during which Members will be entitled to vote in the ballot for election of Candidates to RFB. The voting period will be no greater than 21 days.
  6. BrahimHemdani
    Perhaps, purely on share price but a big strategic mistake in my book.
  7. BrahimHemdani
    And it will take them at least 5 mins to throw the case out.
  8. BrahimHemdani
    No they couldn't, as I and others have pointed out several times; the rule is mandatory where a suspended player plays in a match, the match is forfeit. End of.... However, I did agree with you earlier to the extent that it may make UEFA sit up and change the rule to allow flexibility in future as with an ineligible player. Lastly, just to reiterate, presumably all or 99% of other teams in the competition knew the Rules and abided by them.
  9. BrahimHemdani
    I agree with all these points. It's a bit like the unelected RF committee only worse because this committee are selecting the candidates. The categories are ridiculous. If there's a category for women why not one or several for men. If ethnic minorities why not non-ethnic minorities. If disabled, why not able bodied. etc etc. There should not be any categories, we are all Rangers Fans, the election should be open to anyone who wants to stand and people can state in their manifestos any personal information that they consider relevant.
  10. BrahimHemdani
    This is a very surprising decision as I understood that both the government, the football authorities and certainly SD were behind it on a trial basis and it has been installed at Bristol City, albeit for rugby only at the moment. http://www.safestandingroadshow.co.uk/
  11. BrahimHemdani
    Wish it was as easy to get in the SPL!
  12. BrahimHemdani
    What's a "King" then in South Africa?
  13. BrahimHemdani
    I think that some of these words at least were put in his mouth; but in any event what he's doing here is preparing his defence so that he can say: Look I told you in August that opposition players will target me with elbows and kicks (because they know how easy it is to wind me up), sorry I lost the plot again in the face of this provocation.
  14. BrahimHemdani
    I'm sure Mr King of SA would be happy to lend them it at nil interest for a short period.
  15. BrahimHemdani
    They'll be working on a draft for sure but I don't think it need be ready to go when the decision is announced because they have three days (or something like that) to provide the stated case.
  16. BrahimHemdani
    Just adding to #364 Legia’s arguments on 17.1 & 17.2 are a complete distortion of the Rules; because the phrase "in cases where all aspects of the offence have been revealed by the party charged" refers to cases where the information provided by the party charged has been decisive in uncovering or establishing a breach of the Rules; which is not the case here. It doesn’t mean that because you have come clean you can get off or have the penalty reduced. At first reading I thought Art. 20.1 referred to the taking of the decision being suspended but I now see that it refers to things like suspensions (but not from all football) themselves being suspended e.g. you get a 2 game ban suspended for a year if you are well-behaved. However I don’t see how that could apply as they ask “(match forfeited 0:3 in favour for Celtic FC) to be suspended"; because how can you suspend a forfeited game? That’s just ridiculous. So on second reading I am more convinced than ever that the Appeal will fail.
  17. BrahimHemdani
    An excellent summation of the whys, wherefores and somesuch!
  18. BrahimHemdani
    Hopefully we're actively trying to resurrect the Mohsni deal right now; Shiels and Daly have no future at Ibrox. Peralta could still be our RB.
  19. BrahimHemdani
    The Berliner of Germany?
  20. BrahimHemdani
    I think that's almost correct. Legia may well have been advised of the decision verbally and in any event will be advised before it is made public. UEFA will then issue a statement just outlining the facts i.e. the Appeal by Legia Warsaw against the decision of the Uefa Control, Ethics and Disciplinary Body ...... has been upheld/dismissed etc (consequences). Unlikely that the Statement will give reasons. If the Appeal is dismissed Legia will then ask for the stated case i.e. the reasons for the decision so that they can take it to the CAS.
  21. BrahimHemdani
    Well this is a first Mr Anchorman, agreeing with BH, whatever next. How would he be "forced"? The only thing I can think of is by getting a big fat pay off but then that would eat into any fee we get. But Brighton? Just doesn't make sense to me. He seemed particularly keen not to have to move his family/kids schools etc last time; is temporary discontent (as cited by SC) enough to change that?
  22. BrahimHemdani
    I went to some lengths to explain when I feel that objective and subjective views are appropriate on this forum; but you chose to ignore my comments and respond with sarcasm. I didn't "play neutral" in this case; that much at least should be clear to you.
  23. BrahimHemdani
    On these three points of Appeal at a quick read: 17.1 - Not clear if this can override a mandatory penalty; on the face of it, it might, but then what would be the point of a mandatory penalty. It's not clear if Legia have put forward any mitigating circumstances or indeed what might constitute mitigating circumstances in this case. Possibly the fact that the suspension had actually been served? Also not clear what might constitute aggravating circumstances. 17.2 - As far as we know UEFA charged Legia so this does not appear to apply. 20.1 - May have allowed a suspension of the disciplinary procedures; but it's not clear how that would have helped Legia as ultimately the case would have been decided on the same facts. May have allowed the Chair a case for delaying a decision but then we go back to the time of the draw etc and his reasons for going ahead. 17.2 Seems to be Legia's strongest hope but without knowing how it has been applied in the past it is difficult to make an assessment in this case. Overall, my feeling is that the Appeal will fail and UEFA will be content for Legia to take it to the CAS.
  24. BrahimHemdani
    It seems to me that the fantasy meeting was just that and Mr Graham's take on it, is just opportunistic nonsense. Why didn't he point out that if it was indeed a plc Board Meeting then both Easdales couldn't have been there anyway (or at least it couldn't have had a fantasy Minute noting that they were both there)? Quite nauseating really.
  25. BrahimHemdani
    I don't get this at all. He has three seasons left on his contract and is almost certainly the next captain of Rangers. Money didn't seem to be a major issue when he signed in 2012; he could have gone elsewhere for more. He refused to go to Nottingham apparently in February, so why would he want to go to Brighton now? They will likely be strugglers in the Championship. I know we are no great shakes but we SHOULD be on the up; can't see Brighton contesting the promotion places or even play-offs.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.