Danny

You have to earn trust. At least that's the way it should be.

Probably, just never heard of the term 'muckraking'. I saw someone post on Facebook about being disappointed with the statement, saying it lacked dignity and class. Others seem to love the 'fightback' and support the whole thing. I personally think it's getting very messy and I don't know if I agree with the club that the BBC is biased against Rangers at all.

Yes, but not everyone will be happy to pay for it. Plus it also covers TV games too on the BBC.

Agree with all those who gave MOTM to Whittaker.

Did we not mean 'mudraking' exercise?

Oh good, the organisation we all want talking to Whyte has the chance. /sarcasm.

I'm keeping out of all this, I find it messy, troubling, and slightly disturbing. But it does bother me that UK Rangers fans outside of those who attend Ibrox will be denied coverage on radio for home games. I feel this ban is too blanket, and that Whyte should have allowed the BBC to continue their coverage of our matches because he's now isolated those who don't go to home matches.

My point is no one has actually proven he said the comment about an Italian game. The only proof in this thread is that he said it about an OF game. I'd like the evidence he also said it about an Italian game in which he was involved.

No one's proven a thing in this thread. I see a lot of accusations and conjecture, but no actual proof. And believe me, if I am convinced he's lying, I will condemn as everyone else is. But there appears to be a bandwagon here and I can't see the wheels.

I'd like to know how the content on page 3 is proven lies.

Definitely our weakest position I agree.

Webster seems ok at Hearts - I think he's been injured once since he returned. Ironically enough it was the opening match of the season at Ibrox. Webster and Ibrox don't mix.

I'd choose Wilson and Webster.

The 2 pieces of good news are that neither Iniesta (their best player) or Fabregas are involved tonight. And Torres isn't exactly in bleeding edge form.

Know who I liked but who I reckon got a pretty raw deal? Lionel Charbonnier.

Biggest thing I remember about Woods, other than the fact he was bloody good, was in the 89/90 season he was injured by our very own Kenny McDowall on the opening day of the season, then got injured later on a couple of months later. Pretty injury disrupted season he had there.

Oh shut up you grump!

Pure supposition as it's never been mentioned, but given his 'rival' Forrest at Celtic who's the same age as him has made the move from U21's to full international, when do we suppose Gregg might get a cap or two? Has he not proven himself 'unlike' Forrest?

You just have to look at the forums as a sample of the rivalry between groups.

He's also missing many more chances now than he used to. Quite honestly I don't really know where we stand with him - the soundbites in the press send out mixed messages.

I think it does, and that's why I suggest he's unhappy. Others have commented on it too. Huff or not, he's not showing the same level of ability he did last year. He would have to be very unprofessional not to show good work rate no matter how he's feeling emotionally.

So we're both really just guessing then

He's unlikely to Met. If I am honest, I think Jelavic joined us purely as a stepping stone, and played to his fullest last season hoping for glitzy offers from a decent Premiership club. He almost certainly didn't expect to still be here this season. He comes across slightly like a Bougherra figure - looking for the big move away and rarely concealing his desire to get said glamorous move. And that he hasn't received it has put him in the same kind of huff Bougherra ended up in during his last season where his form was patchy at best and he looked anything but happy being here. However, I wouldn't expect, if Jelavic does leave, for him to emulate the Bougherra by saying the offer he was given by Rangers (to stay) 'made him sick'. He doesn't come across quite as classless and mercenary. But end of the point strikers are all about goals, and Lafferty and Naismith are both more valuable to us this season.

So you're saying that at no point in that match did Osasuna have any possession at all? That they created absolutely zero pressure? Bear in mind I didn't see said game.

You seem to be thinking this is a Scotland team blessed with great players! There is no 'least' we should be doing because we're not exactly that great. Do you have high expectations normally for the national side?