der Berliner 3,271 Posted October 9, 2016 Share Posted October 9, 2016 One more week for the media to find some chap who hasn't been interviewed yet. Neat. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rbr 1,247 Posted October 9, 2016 Share Posted October 9, 2016 This is just getting stupid , make a decision and get on with it 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
chilledbear 16 Posted October 9, 2016 Share Posted October 9, 2016 This is just getting stupid , make a decision and get on with it All to do with money probably, can we afford whatever we want to do? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,288 Posted October 9, 2016 Share Posted October 9, 2016 All to do with money probably, can we afford whatever we want to do? How much is the inevitable pay-off going to cost ? I'm still not convinced it was MW who signed Barton 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
onevision 1,454 Posted October 9, 2016 Share Posted October 9, 2016 If he has broken club rules regarding betting then its looking more likely to be a sacking than a pay off. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,288 Posted October 9, 2016 Share Posted October 9, 2016 If he has broken club rules regarding betting then its looking more likely to be a sacking than a pay off. So why weren't Simonsen & Black sacked then? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JFK-1 1,675 Posted October 9, 2016 Share Posted October 9, 2016 Where do you guys get a week from? It states until further notice and that could mean until his contract is ended. It's somewhat vague because the statement does indeed mention a week and also 'until further notice' JOEY BARTON has been informed that his suspension by the Club has been extended by one week. This is part of a formal disciplinary procedure and Joey has been instructed not to return to Ibrox or Auchenhowie until further notice. Neither party (the Club and player) will make any further statement or comment. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
forlanssister 3,050 Posted October 9, 2016 Share Posted October 9, 2016 So why weren't Simonsen & Black sacked then? Sadly we made a rod for our own backs, both should have been dismissed immediately it was brought to light. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MacK1950 2,235 Posted October 9, 2016 Share Posted October 9, 2016 I don't care about the betting aspect,Barton is proving to be a chip on our shoulder and is a disruptive influence and is not needed. Halliday and Holt have proved that the midfield does not need Barton and when Rossiter is fit we have ample cover,so I would be glad if we could get rid of what is now a negative influence on the team. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
aweebluesoandso 290 Posted October 9, 2016 Share Posted October 9, 2016 He's a goner, if he's found guilty by the SFA over the betting allegation, it will be a sacking. I think this is what the club are hoping for, less of a payout imo. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.