Bluedell
-
Posts
17,839 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
99
Everything posted by Bluedell
-
It's not new. It's been there since Ellis.
-
There's no such thing as far as I can see. If their debt is sitting at �£5m and ours at, say, �£25m then there's still a fair bit to go for us to be near each other, particulalry with the McGeady transfer fee. Like TB, I'm surprised that their results are as good as this.
-
There's another couple of sub-headings between deletions and Rangers..."Amendments" and "disclosure table". We are still there.
-
Rangers 2 - 1 Kilmarnock: Player Ratings and MoM Poll
Bluedell replied to Frankie's topic in Rangers Chat
I'd go for -
I thought that you didn't give a stuff about him?
-
Saying "I couldn't give a stuff about Thomson" suggests more than ambivalence, even if it wasn't intended.
-
I don't remember Prodan ever playing for us. However I'd still be more interested in what he did after leaving us than a guy from Lincoln City. A forum would get pretty boring if everyone who had no interest in a subject posted to that on it. However posting on it would normally suggest that you do have interest in it.
-
I find it strange that some they're not interested in him, but still felt that they had to open the thread, read it and add a post to it. I guess playing a role in winning 2 league titles earns you no gratitude or respect these days. "Once a Ranger, always a Ranger" obviously doesn't apply any more.
-
Why parlous Rangers will trump Celtic to third successive SPL title
Bluedell replied to ian1964's topic in Rangers Chat
Fat Eck can't help but bring the RST incorrectly into it. He's become as bad as Spiers for that. -
Or else the new contracts are being offered from the additional CL money that we got from Celtic getting knocked out....or the money that we are getting for Thomson himself....
-
Feckin' depressing.
-
Yeah, he was outstanding last season. Would have been in my EPL team of the year. Let's keep the fingers crossed that someone else comes in for him.
-
Will do my best.
-
There's only one person to blame that the deal has fallen through. http://www.gersnetonline.co.uk/vb/showthread.php?t=19328 Had to tempt fate.
-
He's been saying that for over a week now. Obviously desperate to get his hands on the fee to allow more signings.
-
Done as GN_BD. Looking to beat last year's 3rd place. :spl: Hopefully we'll get weekly reminders?
-
The title of this thread is misleading. To be more of something there has been some to start with. :fish:
-
I don't know how you can say that so definitively given the duff info that's been flying around during the last 6 months, from the best of sources.
-
As I see it, there are 2 issues with the wages cap (if there is one in place): 1. If we break it for Boyd then we would have many other players in the squad wanting it broken as well, and it would lead to general unhappiness. What's the point in a cap if it is going to be broken at the first hint of an issue. 2. We are working within the confines of the bank-imposed business plan. We don't know what it says but it could be that iot does not allow us to offer wages over a certain level. It also may just boil down to what the club/Walter believed Boyd was worth. If they felt that the offer on the table was the maximum that they could offer to a player who tended to be played in around 1 out of every 5 big games then they are correct in sticking to their guns.
-
Rangers have agreed a �£1.5million fee with Stoke City for James Beattie.
Bluedell replied to pete's topic in Rangers Chat
A better option that Velicka. -
He wasnae that bad [ame= ]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ben3QjHFqzM[/ame]
-
I thought it was NOTW on Sunday, unless you are talking about it previously? Again, I think it may have been some down-market uninformed tabloid. Scotzine would have just taken great delight in putting a one-sided (and obviously inaccurate) spin on it.
-
The article is a lot of crap as Dave King doesn't own any Rangers shares.
-
Is he suspended for our next 2 games anyway?
-
:box: