Leaderboard
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation on 13/11/21 in all areas
-
Diddums. Stop playing the victim. Managers leave--with their backroom staff--all the time. We'll be fine. Quite frankly, I think we'll be better off, because we've been p*sh this season. If we were still plodding along the way we've been going, we would have been in trouble after December - and everyone would be calling for SG and his backroom staff to go. If something comes out that paints it in a different light, I'll put my hands up. Until then, it's conspiracy nonsense. It seems to be coming from those that least wanted him to go. They've gone a full 180. I agree with the last point: I too don't care what happens to him now. I'm grateful for what he's done, and now he's moved on. It was always going to happen. My focus is on my club.5 points
-
I don't get why fans what to focus on and expand so much energy on someone they think is a "snake" / "rat" instead of focussing on what remains. What remains is far more important than what has departed. What remains has been here for 150 years and will be around for another 150 years. What remains is one of the biggest and best institutions in world football. What remains is a club who prosper from adversity. What remains deserves our undivided focus, attention and energy. Those who have left don't.4 points
-
Great post. We are Rangers. No player or manager matters in comparison.3 points
-
In that, or similar, instance, the Club would be in control of the situation, and, one would like to think, making decisions in the best interests of the Club; that is a very different scenario from that of Mr Gerrard sneakily and surreptitiously engineering a departure for him and all his staff, leaving the Club in a hole, the depth of which has yet to be established. It has little to do, ultimately, with 'loyalty', but very much to do with the impact on the Club of the manager's underhand machinations. He buggered off, sharpish, very sharpish, indeed, and left the Club with a series of problems; but, och, these things happen, he is a great guy, he delivered 55, and we should be forever grateful to him. Not for me; and remember, before we get all misty eyed, he was paid to deliver the League Title: it was his job.3 points
-
Let's just imagine for a moment that Gerrard stayed. Come the new Year OF match, Celtic are only two points behind. They win the match to go top. Cue hysteria for sacking the manager from the same quarters which are currently decrying the lack of loyalty. This is exactly what would have happened but I doubt whether the people screaming for the sack would describe themselves as snakes3 points
-
Sad to see so much hatred directed to Steven Gerrard by our so called loyal fans the only thing hatred destroys is yourselves. For goodness sake grow up .3 points
-
2 points
-
I schooled with Lulu's sister, Edwina and the family are solid. I watched a two hour documentary 20 years past, Jools Holland was hosting a take on early British Blues. We are talking early sixties, on the cusp of the Beatles. Contributors were Tom Jones, Van Morrison, Chris Farlowe, Mick Fleetwood, Al Green .... etc. They talked about the the best interpreters and players. It was agreed the Female contribution was on the light side, obvious exceptions being Dusty Springfield, Kiki Dee, Elkie Brooks, ..... Anyways, the Toms, Vans, Als ..... all agreed the one that could do it live was Lulu, check out her interpretation of , 'To Sir with Love'. Lulu opened the Edmiston Club, the Club should invite her back to open the new Edmiston when opened. A night of Blues with Lulu -sounds good and most appropriate.2 points
-
I don't see that being frustrated about Gerrard leaving and stripping the club almost all backroom staff means that you're playing the victim. When do Rangers managers voluntarily leave with their backroom staff? We're top of the league, still with a great chance of getting out the European group stage and our next game is a SF, and yet we've been "pish" and if we carried on like we have been everyone would be calling for Gerrard to go? Who is coming up with conspiracy nonsense? If you feel that we are better off with Gerrard leaving, why weren't you calling for his sacking?2 points
-
That's all we can do! let's hope Vanbronckhorst gets the job, and quick, he needs hit the ground running, on Monday morning!!2 points
-
Gerrard isn't a snake or a rat - he's a Scouser, who has acted in his own interests. He's gone. Let's get on with winning the league.2 points
-
Agreed but experience can be somewhat overrated in some cases. Especially if their most recent "experience" is generally mediocre. For example, Scotland recently got Alex McLeish in due to his "experience". Most of the good things that McLeish created happened about 13/14 years ago. Everything after that was negative and riddled with over fussy and reactionary football. Let's not forget SG had no experience whatsoever and in one season gave us an identity. Was it perfect? No. But it was a far cry from the Tims skelping us by 4/5 goals and getting beat by some no marks for Luxembourg.2 points
-
2 points
-
2 points
-
That's exactly what we need. If the new manager sees Rangers as a stepping stone to bigger things then he can only gravitate to those higher levels by being a success. We're not going to get a manager who is here to build a dynasty. Those days are gone. The only people that should be building dynasties are the current custodians of Rangers by always appointing a manager with a progressive vision that cements and builds upon the overall identity of our play.2 points
-
He was always gonna take his backroom staff with him, wasn't a surprise they all left with him. And left us in a worse state than China? Come on......2 points
-
You are booked into the dressing room for 3pm next Sunday @CammyF - well said Sir2 points
-
I love how how he points to his ears towards the tartan Muppets. One of our own2 points
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
Wish he would. How is he even still in the squad when Middleton (who played well for the U21s last night) can't seem to get a look in?1 point
-
1 point
-
Souness wanted to finish the season. Murray made him finish up immediately.1 point
-
Nothing more than lazy journalism - we heard the same when Rodgers left for LCFC.1 point
-
Yeah YouTube does this sometimes - opens up when you click the "watch on Youtube" link ?1 point
-
I didn't say you did. His leaving doesn't impact the club any more or less than the last manager who left during a season, or the one before him, or the ones before that. He isn't the first and won't be the last Rangers manager to leave during a season. They leave with us top of league, in cup semi-final and with a great opportunity to qualify from our EL Group. We have the best squad of players we've had in years. Football managers come and go and we as a club should have all scenarios covered and to be fair, it looks like we have had plans in place for this eventuality. One candidate already interviewed (this morning) and two other candidates to interview over the weekend. Day or two evaluate the interviews and the candidates and replacement in place early next week.1 point
-
1 point
-
Kamara and Kent only players I can see SG comimg back for. He might take Goldson as backup but he's shopping in a different supermarket now.1 point
-
Gerrard has left us sneakily, and in the shit, and for that he deserves as much opprobrium as we can throw at him. Whatever happens, if there is a benefit, it will be nothing to do with Gerrard; it would be Old Dame Fortune playing us right, as much as anything else. If people, later in the hypothetical season would call for his dismissal, then the Club would have to make a decision, in its own interests, and would be able to control, substantially, any process of removal and replacement. That is not the case when, as now, the manager and all his staff up sticks and move, rather suddenly. Note too, that the urgency required, given that there is no one left to run the team, puts the Club in a rather weak negotiating position. It's at least arguable that it is not able to control the process as it would wish. It has nothing to do with 'loyalty', and I don't care about Gerrard's reasons, it is about the potential impact the sudden departures will have on the squad, and on the rest of this rather important season. I see no reason to wish him well, rather the opposite.1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
But whoever hates his brother is in the darkness and walks in the darkness, and does not know where he is going, because the darkness has blinded his eyes.1 point
-
We are in such a better position on and off the pitch than last time when we were looking for a manager. Its quite exciting and I do wonder if Gerrard leaving will actually become a good thing as there was clearly something up this season.1 point
-
Wow that’s a depressing list. Hopefully we are looking at some options the press hasn’t got wind of.1 point
-
We all knew SG would leave Rangers, we all knew this as soon as he signed up as our manager. When is a good time to leave? He is hardly the first Rangers manager to leave during a season. If someone said to me the day SG signed that he'd leave after delivering 55 and reinstating us as a decent European reputation, I would have taken that. Let's remember the mess we were in when he took over. Being Scottish Champions felt like it was miles away, and as for Europe, well it was an nightmare. He's gone, as we knew he would, the circumstance and merits of his departure could be discussed long into the night, but what's the point? Id rather focus my energy on the future, we have a league to win, and it is winnable, we are in pole position despite being a shadow of the team we know we can be. Rangers are bigger than any one person, Rangers have survived and prospered worse situations than we find ourselves in at this moment in time.1 point
-
Against a backcloth of a team that has seemed stale and poorly motivated for some time, comes the resignation of Steven Gerrard and his entire backroom staff. We are expected to believe that these people were all approached, negotiated personal terms and concluded contracts in the short time between Dean Smith being sacked on Sunday and Aston Villa revealing their new management team 4 days later. Much more likely, this group had been approached well before Dean Smith was sacked and it was merely a matter of allowing a decent few days to pass before making the announcement. We all know this is almost certainly the case. However, it raises another question. Were Gerrard and his staff entertaining previous approaches from other clubs while still in place at Rangers and could that to some extent explain or have contributed to the decline we've all seen on the park these last 3 months? Was it known among the players that the management team wanted out? Conspiracy theory or plausible possibility? One thing seems sure, their move to Aston Villa was a little too smooth and seamless to naively believe it came out of the blue and, if that's the case, then Gerrard and his staff have indeed shown enormous and unforgivable disrespect to a club that only ever treated them well.1 point
This leaderboard is set to London/GMT+01:00